header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Execute. Marry. Execute.

Is now the time to turn your pre-nup into a post-nup? Asks Mark Irving

In the case of MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64, the Privy Council addressed the vexed question of the enforceability of pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements. Mr and Mrs MacLeod were married in Florida on Valentine’s Day 1994 and on the same day signed a pre-nuptial agreement.

There was a considerable difference in wealth and age between them. Mr MacLeod had amassed huge wealth through business development and was 49. Mrs MacLeod had been studying for a degree in business administration and was 27. Four months later they moved from the US to the Isle of Man, where they lived together for the remainder of their nearly 10 year marriage, and had five sons.

In 1997 a temporary post-nuptial agreement was signed which lapsed a year later. In July 2002 a further post-nuptial agreement was signed. It is this latter agreement which became the bone of contention between the parties upon their divorce. The 2002 agreement did a lot. It confirmed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll