header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019
Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

High Court records rise in number of executor disputes

A sudden jump in the number of (usually rare) cases where heirs try to oust executors has been recorded by the High Court.

The High Court saw 138 new cases of this type last year, an increase from zero new cases in 2017, according to figures obtained by private client firm Boodle Hatfield.

Disputes typically arise where heirs feel executors aren’t distributing enough of the estate or moving quickly enough or where there has been a breakdown in trust and confidence. 

Mark Lindley, partner at Boodle Hatfield, said: ‘It appears that more heirs are now willing to try to seize control of estates and are using the courts to remove executors who they think are not acting in their interests. 

‘Claims such as this are usually rare as executors often choose to retire rather than face court proceedings and the risk of personal costs liability.’

Executors play a particularly important role where the deceased set up a discretionary trust, as this gives them control over who should benefit from the estate. This arrangement is often used to administer the estate of high net worth individuals. Regardless of wealth, however, the legal costs involved in taking an argument to court can substantially deplete the amount left.

Lindley said: ‘Disputes over high-value estates can very easily occur if high net worth individuals do not put enough thought into how their wealth will be distributed. The apparent increase in applications to remove executors demonstrates the importance of proper advice when making a will, but also for executors when administering estates on how to avoid claims by the beneficiaries.  The court places paramount importance, ultimately, on the beneficiaries’ interests.’

Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll