header-logo header-logo

Expensive mistakes

19 November 2009 / Katherine Rees
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Katherine Rees examines risks arising from property transactions

I suspect that, if you were to ask a lawyer in the throes of a large transaction what part of the deal featured in their nightmares, he or she would be most spooked by the fear of getting the intricacies of a complex provision wrong.

However, as recent cases have shown, claims are just as likely to arise from oversights or simple (but potentially expensive) mistakes as they are from subtle errors of legal analysis or judgment.

The economic crisis gives rise to its own particular claims, specifically those brought by lenders against solicitors and valuers, which tend to centre round the professional’s alleged failure to report information which would have affected the decision to lend.

While those claims abound, the more traditional claims against property lawyers also continue. Indeed, they look set to increase as mistakes made in the good times come to light during the downturn.

In this article I have selected three perennial sources of problems for solicitors which the courts have had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll