header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Expert preparation

Mark Solon reports on the risks stemming from speculative expert evidence & a lack of preparation

The trial bundle must include all disclosed experts’ reports, relevant to matters that remain in dispute on which the parties seek to rely. In a complex case a separate bundle of the expert evidence might be necessary. Further steps to take are listed below:

(i) Ensure that you include the correct final served version of the expert’s report in the bundle.
(ii) Note that written questions on the experts’ reports, under CPR 35.6, and the experts’ replies form part of the reports and should be filed with them in the bundle.
(iii) Note that the joint statements of experts’ discussions under CPR 35.12 are not binding, and need not be included in the bundle, although they will be on the court file. If both parties are content to be bound by the statements then they should be included in the bundle.
(iv) Consider where to locate documents referred to in the experts’ reports. Witness statements, statements of case etc are best filed elsewhere. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll