header-logo header-logo

Expert preparation

24 June 2010 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Mark Solon reports on the risks stemming from speculative expert evidence & a lack of preparation

The trial bundle must include all disclosed experts’ reports, relevant to matters that remain in dispute on which the parties seek to rely. In a complex case a separate bundle of the expert evidence might be necessary. Further steps to take are listed below:

(i) Ensure that you include the correct final served version of the expert’s report in the bundle.
(ii) Note that written questions on the experts’ reports, under CPR 35.6, and the experts’ replies form part of the reports and should be filed with them in the bundle.
(iii) Note that the joint statements of experts’ discussions under CPR 35.12 are not binding, and need not be included in the bundle, although they will be on the court file. If both parties are content to be bound by the statements then they should be included in the bundle.
(iv) Consider where to locate documents referred to in the experts’ reports. Witness statements, statements of case etc are best filed elsewhere. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll