header-logo header-logo

Experts could be quizzed on civil procedure

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Expert witness reports could be ruled inadmissible unless experts include a statement that they understand the rules of civil procedure

Amendments to Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which came into force this month, require experts to sign a revised statement of truth and a new declaration of awareness of the civil procedure rules, practice directions and protocols.

Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of Pt 35. If cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined on their knowledge.

Mark Solon, solicitor and managing director of legal consultancy, Bond Solon, says: “Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court.

“This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. The difficulty is that there is no central body to inform experts of changes to the law that apply to them. Experts come from such diverse areas of expertise, from accountants to zoologists.”

Bond Solon, which runs training courses for experts, will put a short video clip covering the new rules on You Tube. It can also be seen on their website at www.bondsolon.com/Civil-procedure-rules.

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll