header-logo header-logo

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Experts could be quizzed on civil procedure

Expert witness reports could be ruled inadmissible unless experts include a statement that they understand the rules of civil procedure

Amendments to Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which came into force this month, require experts to sign a revised statement of truth and a new declaration of awareness of the civil procedure rules, practice directions and protocols.

Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of Pt 35. If cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined on their knowledge.

Mark Solon, solicitor and managing director of legal consultancy, Bond Solon, says: “Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court.

“This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. The difficulty is that there is no central body to inform experts of changes to the law that apply to them. Experts come from such diverse areas of expertise, from accountants to zoologists.”

Bond Solon, which runs training courses for experts, will put a short video clip covering the new rules on You Tube. It can also be seen on their website at www.bondsolon.com/Civil-procedure-rules.

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll