header-logo header-logo

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Experts could be quizzed on civil procedure

Expert witness reports could be ruled inadmissible unless experts include a statement that they understand the rules of civil procedure

Amendments to Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which came into force this month, require experts to sign a revised statement of truth and a new declaration of awareness of the civil procedure rules, practice directions and protocols.

Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of Pt 35. If cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined on their knowledge.

Mark Solon, solicitor and managing director of legal consultancy, Bond Solon, says: “Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court.

“This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. The difficulty is that there is no central body to inform experts of changes to the law that apply to them. Experts come from such diverse areas of expertise, from accountants to zoologists.”

Bond Solon, which runs training courses for experts, will put a short video clip covering the new rules on You Tube. It can also be seen on their website at www.bondsolon.com/Civil-procedure-rules.

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll