header-logo header-logo

Experts could be quizzed on civil procedure

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Expert witness reports could be ruled inadmissible unless experts include a statement that they understand the rules of civil procedure

Amendments to Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which came into force this month, require experts to sign a revised statement of truth and a new declaration of awareness of the civil procedure rules, practice directions and protocols.

Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of Pt 35. If cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined on their knowledge.

Mark Solon, solicitor and managing director of legal consultancy, Bond Solon, says: “Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court.

“This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. The difficulty is that there is no central body to inform experts of changes to the law that apply to them. Experts come from such diverse areas of expertise, from accountants to zoologists.”

Bond Solon, which runs training courses for experts, will put a short video clip covering the new rules on You Tube. It can also be seen on their website at www.bondsolon.com/Civil-procedure-rules.

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll