header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition

Tenderenda v Polish Judicial Authority [2012] EWHC 3800 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Jan)

Section 2(6)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003 required “particulars of the conviction” to be given in the warrant. What s 2(6)(b) required was underlying evidence, of an enforceable judgment or decision in a civil law system where a judgment had not become final, and so enforceable, until a short period of time had elapsed after it had been pronounced. Evidence of that judgment could be given by identifying the court in which the judgment had been given, the file number of the case in which it was given, the particulars of the offence of which an individual was convicted and the date on which the judgment, which later became final, had been given.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll