header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition—Convention rights—Polish extradition

Krolik and others v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Sir John Thomas P and Globe J, 17 August 2012

The Administrative Court has given guidance on the future treatment of appeals against extradition to Poland where an appellant relies upon the alleged prison conditions in Poland to support a submission under Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Mark Smith (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the appellants. Hannah Pye and Katherine Tyler (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authorities.

Six extradition appeals were listed together as in each case the sole issue was the same, namely whether to extradite the appellants under either accusation or conviction European Arrest Warrants would be a breach of Art 3 of the Convention by reason of prison conditions in Poland. One of the purposes of hearing the six appeals together was to enable the court to set out the way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll