header-logo header-logo

Extradition—Convention rights—Polish extradition

07 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Krolik and others v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Sir John Thomas P and Globe J, 17 August 2012

The Administrative Court has given guidance on the future treatment of appeals against extradition to Poland where an appellant relies upon the alleged prison conditions in Poland to support a submission under Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Mark Smith (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the appellants. Hannah Pye and Katherine Tyler (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authorities.

Six extradition appeals were listed together as in each case the sole issue was the same, namely whether to extradite the appellants under either accusation or conviction European Arrest Warrants would be a breach of Art 3 of the Convention by reason of prison conditions in Poland. One of the purposes of hearing the six appeals together was to enable the court to set out the way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll