header-logo header-logo

01 September 2013 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fair share?

Roderick Ramage queries whether the employee shareholder scheme can become widespread

George Osborne’s harebrained proposal for employee shareholders, which was announced at the Conservative Party Conference last October, made it to the statute book and came into force yesterday (1 September 2013).

The scheme for employees to be given shares in their employer in exchange for relinquishing certain statutory employment protection rights became law by s 31 of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, which inserted ss 47G, 104G and 205A into the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), of which s 205A is the principal section. The conditions for an individual to become an employee shareholder are that:

  • he and his employer make an agreement for him to be one;

  • the employer issues or procures its parent company to issue fully paid shares with a value on the day of issue of not less than £2,000, for which the individual gives no consideration;

  • the employer or prospective employer gives to him a written statement of the status of an employee shareholder and the terms of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll