header-logo header-logo

01 September 2013 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fair share?

Roderick Ramage queries whether the employee shareholder scheme can become widespread

George Osborne’s harebrained proposal for employee shareholders, which was announced at the Conservative Party Conference last October, made it to the statute book and came into force yesterday (1 September 2013).

The scheme for employees to be given shares in their employer in exchange for relinquishing certain statutory employment protection rights became law by s 31 of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, which inserted ss 47G, 104G and 205A into the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), of which s 205A is the principal section. The conditions for an individual to become an employee shareholder are that:

  • he and his employer make an agreement for him to be one;

  • the employer issues or procures its parent company to issue fully paid shares with a value on the day of issue of not less than £2,000, for which the individual gives no consideration;

  • the employer or prospective employer gives to him a written statement of the status of an employee shareholder and the terms of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll