header-logo header-logo

01 September 2013 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fair share?

Roderick Ramage queries whether the employee shareholder scheme can become widespread

George Osborne’s harebrained proposal for employee shareholders, which was announced at the Conservative Party Conference last October, made it to the statute book and came into force yesterday (1 September 2013).

The scheme for employees to be given shares in their employer in exchange for relinquishing certain statutory employment protection rights became law by s 31 of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, which inserted ss 47G, 104G and 205A into the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), of which s 205A is the principal section. The conditions for an individual to become an employee shareholder are that:

  • he and his employer make an agreement for him to be one;

  • the employer issues or procures its parent company to issue fully paid shares with a value on the day of issue of not less than £2,000, for which the individual gives no consideration;

  • the employer or prospective employer gives to him a written statement of the status of an employee shareholder and the terms of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll