header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

False imprisonment

Stellato v Ministry of Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1435, [2010] All ER (D) 171 (Dec)

In principle, a grant of bail was not an order for the detention of the person to whom it was granted. To the contrary, it was a grant of liberty to someone who would otherwise be detained.

The legal justification for his detention was to be found elsewhere: in the case of a person suspected of crime, in the powers of arrest of a constable under a warrant issued by a magistrates court, or without a warrant, and powers to remand pending trial or further hearing. Similarly, there was statutory authority for detention in immigration cases. A grant of bail might be conditional or unconditional. A condition of bail did not impose an obligation on the person granted bail. It was a true condition. It qualified the grant of liberty made by the grant of bail. If the person granted bail did not comply with the conditions of his bail, he was liable to be returned to custody.

If so, the legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll