header-logo header-logo

Family court judge writes letter to 14-year-old ‘Sam’

03 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

A family court judge has written a custody judgment in the format of a letter to a 14 year-old boy, known as ‘Sam’.

Mr Justice Peter Jackson, in Re A (Letter to a Young Person) [2017] EWFC 48, met privately with the boy, who wished to join his father in Scandinavia, against his mother and stepfather’s wishes.

Jackson J decided, however, that the boy should stay in the UK. He gave his decision in the form of a letter to Sam, which he read to the parents and gave to Sam’s solicitor to discuss with him when he came back from a school trip. In the judgment he writes, ‘This case is about you and your future, so I write this letter as a way of giving my decision to you and your parents.’ He sets out his reasoning, stating that he was impressed with Sam’s evidence but feels they are significantly formed by loyalty to his father.

Jackson J went on to say that ‘there needs to be an end to proceedings of this sort. They have been extremely stressful for everyone. This is the fifth case there has been about you and, unless something pretty extraordinary happens, it should be the last.’

Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll