header-logo header-logo

Family—Divorce—Arbitration

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AI v MT [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam)

Family Division, Baker J, 30 January 2013

The High Court has approved a consent order based on a Beth Din procedure in divorce proceedings.

Henry Setright QC and Edward Devereux (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the applicant. Marcus Scott-Manderson QC and Teertha Gupta QC (instructed by Manches LLP) for the respondent. 

Both parties to a divorce proceeding were observant orthodox Jews. The father was Canadian and the mother was British. They married in London in August 2006 in a Jewish religious ceremony, followed by a civil ceremony in Toronto in October 2006. There were two children. Tensions arose and the mother applied for a prohibitive steps order against the father, to stop him removing one of the children from her care. After negotiations, the parties agreed to consider alternative dispute resolution by means of a Beth Din hearing in New York. They signed an agreement providing for all disputes arising out of the marriage to be determined by the Beth Din. The judge indicated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll