header-logo header-logo

28 June 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-detail

Family DoLs court to be launched

A National Deprivation of Liberty court (DoLs) is due to be launched next week, the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane has said

It will be based at the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) under the leadership of Mr Justice Moor. Subject to judicial direction, cases will be heard remotely.

The court will deal with applications seeking authorisation to deprive children of their liberty, and will be supported by two Family High Court/deputy high court judges each week and a dedicated administrative team based in the RCJ.

From 4 July 2022, all new applications seeking these orders will be issued in the RCJ.

Sir Andrew said: ‘This is important, sensitive work and the continued growth in the number of these applications to the family courts requires the creation of a dedicated listing protocol.

‘The national DoLs court will provide the necessary expertise in dealing with these matters.’

The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory will conduct research into work at the court, and will publish the data regularly on its website.

Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll