header-logo header-logo

27 September 2013 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Family fortunes

solon

Mark Solon anticipates the shake-up for expert witnesses in family courts

The single family court to be introduced next April hopes for fewer but better expert witnesses. “Fewer” can be achieved easily, given that restrictions on fees and time-scales are leading to grumblings within the ranks, but what about “better”?

When I asked Lord Justice Ryder, at a Westminster Legal Policy Forum seminar on family justice reform in July, about the likely impact of the new environment on expert witnesses, he commented that numbers would be reduced by “the gateway of the new test”, which is to ensure that an expert is used only where necessary.

He pointed out that there had never been a problem with “experts who subscribed to quality standards, usually through their own professional bodies, but also through referral agencies and those who have trained them” but that “it was the experts who quite often were time expired, who had not kept themselves up to date, who weren’t subject to CPD in their own organisations, who delivered materials that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll