header-logo header-logo

Family fortunes: the forensic factor

11 April 2019 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Rakesh Kapila examines the forensic accountant’s changing role in matrimonial disputes

  • The expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes has changed in recent years.
  • In addition to a greater involvement in business valuations, forensic accountants have been more active in assisting in the compilation of questionnaires and in considering the parties’ pension rights.

The forensic accountant has long had an active role in matrimonial disputes, arising from provisions in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that the court should take account of the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources available to both parties to a divorce.

Although a key aspect of the expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes over the years has related to business valuations as part of the process of identifying the property and financial resources available to both parties, this article provides an overview of how the forensic accountant’s role has changed in recent years and the primary aspects in relation to which useful work is now undertaken.

Leading cases

Developments over the last few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll