header-logo header-logo

Family fortunes: the forensic factor

11 April 2019 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Rakesh Kapila examines the forensic accountant’s changing role in matrimonial disputes

  • The expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes has changed in recent years.
  • In addition to a greater involvement in business valuations, forensic accountants have been more active in assisting in the compilation of questionnaires and in considering the parties’ pension rights.

The forensic accountant has long had an active role in matrimonial disputes, arising from provisions in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that the court should take account of the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources available to both parties to a divorce.

Although a key aspect of the expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes over the years has related to business valuations as part of the process of identifying the property and financial resources available to both parties, this article provides an overview of how the forensic accountant’s role has changed in recent years and the primary aspects in relation to which useful work is now undertaken.

Leading cases

Developments over the last few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll