header-logo header-logo

Family fortunes: the forensic factor

11 April 2019 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Rakesh Kapila examines the forensic accountant’s changing role in matrimonial disputes

  • The expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes has changed in recent years.
  • In addition to a greater involvement in business valuations, forensic accountants have been more active in assisting in the compilation of questionnaires and in considering the parties’ pension rights.

The forensic accountant has long had an active role in matrimonial disputes, arising from provisions in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that the court should take account of the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources available to both parties to a divorce.

Although a key aspect of the expert accountant’s role in matrimonial disputes over the years has related to business valuations as part of the process of identifying the property and financial resources available to both parties, this article provides an overview of how the forensic accountant’s role has changed in recent years and the primary aspects in relation to which useful work is now undertaken.

Leading cases

Developments over the last few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll