header-logo header-logo

Family law in crisis

Cuts to legal aid have thrown family proceedings into chaos, say Kim Beatson, Caroline Bowden & Ellen Lucas, in the second of an exclusive NLJ online series on legal aid post-LASPO

In June 2013 the case of Tufali v Riaz [2013] EWHC 1829 (Fam) came before Holman J. The parties had married in Pakistan in 2010 but the wife had brought divorce proceedings in England in 2012 where the parties had last lived together and the husband was habitually resident. In his Acknowledgement of Service the husband claimed that the parties had already been divorced in Pakistan but no answer was filed. On pronouncement of Decree Nisi a solicitor representing the husband sent a photocopy of a divorce certificate from the Union Council in Pakistan to the court. The district judge adjourned pronouncement of the Decree to enable further evidence to be filed. 

At the hearing before Holman J neither party was legally represented and there was no expert evidence on the law in Pakistan. The wife

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll