header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Donna Whitehead
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family portraits

What is legally recognised as a “family” today?
Donna Whitehead reports

The image of the traditional family, encompassing a heterosexual married couple and their children, is often captured in family portraits. The reality of family life today, however, is very different. At the recent Labour Party conference, prime minister Gordon Brown said that he stood for a Britain that supports all families, and during his first speech as leader of the Labour Party, he indicated his intention to strengthen family life.

CHANGING FACE OF FAMILY LIFE

If a person is asked to list members of their family, they might identify those to whom they are genetically related. Equally they may consider their family to be those who live in the same household, despite the lack of any genetic link. They may include individuals whom they support financially or emotionally, irrespective of genetics or residence. These assorted groups are more likely today to be recognised as a family unit.

In terms of demographics, the Office for National Statistics has recently reported in Families—Focus on Families that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll