header-logo header-logo

20 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14, [2015] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The parties married in 1981 and separated in 1984. In 2011, the appellant wife applied for financial remedy from the respondent husband. The deputy judge made a costs allowance order and refused to strike out the wife’s application. On the husband’s appeal, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, set aside the orders of the deputy judge, struck out the wife’s substantive application and made a repayment order. The Supreme Court, in allowing the wife’s appeal against the strike-out of her application, ruled as to the extent of the jurisdiction to strike out a spouse’s application for a financial order, under r 4.4 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2955). The deputy judge’s costs allowance order was restored and the Court of Appeal’s repayment order set aside.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll