header-logo header-logo

20 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14, [2015] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The parties married in 1981 and separated in 1984. In 2011, the appellant wife applied for financial remedy from the respondent husband. The deputy judge made a costs allowance order and refused to strike out the wife’s application. On the husband’s appeal, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, set aside the orders of the deputy judge, struck out the wife’s substantive application and made a repayment order. The Supreme Court, in allowing the wife’s appeal against the strike-out of her application, ruled as to the extent of the jurisdiction to strike out a spouse’s application for a financial order, under r 4.4 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2955). The deputy judge’s costs allowance order was restored and the Court of Appeal’s repayment order set aside.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll