header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Julie Exton
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The family revolution

nlj_april_17_exton

Is the Family Court a brave—or terrifying—new world, asks Julie Exton

The family arena has undergone an enormous change since my appointment 15 years ago.

Soon the colourful divorce files that brighten up my room will disappear and be replaced by buff-coloured civil files. And, why is that? It is thought appropriate—and I do not disagree—that the routine work of certifying entitlement to a divorce can be wrested from the hands of district judges and, instead, processed by legal advisers. On top of that, divorce applications will be centralised in only a few centres on each Circuit. Here on the Western Circuit, Southampton will bear that particular burden, tiny Bury St Edmunds for the whole of the South East Circuit but, elsewhere, there may be two or three divorce centres. Of course, until the legal advisers adjust to their new role, there will be great pressure on the district judges who sit in the divorce centres to assist and support them.

Consent orders

One of the real issues that flows from this change is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll