header-logo header-logo

The family revolution

17 April 2015 / Julie Exton
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_april_17_exton

Is the Family Court a brave—or terrifying—new world, asks Julie Exton

The family arena has undergone an enormous change since my appointment 15 years ago.

Soon the colourful divorce files that brighten up my room will disappear and be replaced by buff-coloured civil files. And, why is that? It is thought appropriate—and I do not disagree—that the routine work of certifying entitlement to a divorce can be wrested from the hands of district judges and, instead, processed by legal advisers. On top of that, divorce applications will be centralised in only a few centres on each Circuit. Here on the Western Circuit, Southampton will bear that particular burden, tiny Bury St Edmunds for the whole of the South East Circuit but, elsewhere, there may be two or three divorce centres. Of course, until the legal advisers adjust to their new role, there will be great pressure on the district judges who sit in the divorce centres to assist and support them.

Consent orders

One of the real issues that flows from this change is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll