header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Julie Exton
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The family revolution

nlj_april_17_exton

Is the Family Court a brave—or terrifying—new world, asks Julie Exton

The family arena has undergone an enormous change since my appointment 15 years ago.

Soon the colourful divorce files that brighten up my room will disappear and be replaced by buff-coloured civil files. And, why is that? It is thought appropriate—and I do not disagree—that the routine work of certifying entitlement to a divorce can be wrested from the hands of district judges and, instead, processed by legal advisers. On top of that, divorce applications will be centralised in only a few centres on each Circuit. Here on the Western Circuit, Southampton will bear that particular burden, tiny Bury St Edmunds for the whole of the South East Circuit but, elsewhere, there may be two or three divorce centres. Of course, until the legal advisers adjust to their new role, there will be great pressure on the district judges who sit in the divorce centres to assist and support them.

Consent orders

One of the real issues that flows from this change is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll