header-logo header-logo

23 June 2016
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fee hikes attacked by MPs

Justice Select Committee calls on MoJ to release review

MPs have spoken out against fee hikes for court users in the civil and family courts and tribunals.

In a report published last week, the Justice Select Committee called on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to release its post-implementation review of employment tribunal fees, abandon plans to double the £10,000 cap on civil court fees, and halt plans to raise divorce fees from £410 to £550.

It noted that the introduction of issue fees and hearing fees for claimants in the employment tribunals led to a drop in the number of cases brought of nearly 70%. It said factors such as fee remission, vulnerability of claimants and equality of arms should be taken into account when setting fee rates.

Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC, Bar chairman, accused the MoJ of taking a “shot in the dark” approach to imposing court and tribunal fees.

“The committee found what we, and others (including the judiciary), had been saying all along: the MoJ’s evidence base for the charges was flimsy, and insufficient time was allowed to assess the impact of other, concurrent changes in the civil justice system. The reality is that employees, small businesses and others who may have a legitimate claim are being denied the chance to pursue it because of fees which they cannot afford.

“The MoJ now has an opportunity to learn from its mistakes and, as the Committee recommends and as we echo, hold off from its latest plans to restrict access to the Immigration & Asylum Tribunal by increasing fees by 500%.”

On the rise in divorce fees, Nigel Shepherd, chair, Resolution, says: “The committee rightly recognises that this rise effectively amounted to a new tax on divorce; and that by raising it, people were being charged around twice what it actually costs to process a divorce petition.”

Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
back-to-top-scroll