header-logo header-logo

Fee hikes attacked by MPs

23 June 2016
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Justice Select Committee calls on MoJ to release review

MPs have spoken out against fee hikes for court users in the civil and family courts and tribunals.

In a report published last week, the Justice Select Committee called on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to release its post-implementation review of employment tribunal fees, abandon plans to double the £10,000 cap on civil court fees, and halt plans to raise divorce fees from £410 to £550.

It noted that the introduction of issue fees and hearing fees for claimants in the employment tribunals led to a drop in the number of cases brought of nearly 70%. It said factors such as fee remission, vulnerability of claimants and equality of arms should be taken into account when setting fee rates.

Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC, Bar chairman, accused the MoJ of taking a “shot in the dark” approach to imposing court and tribunal fees.

“The committee found what we, and others (including the judiciary), had been saying all along: the MoJ’s evidence base for the charges was flimsy, and insufficient time was allowed to assess the impact of other, concurrent changes in the civil justice system. The reality is that employees, small businesses and others who may have a legitimate claim are being denied the chance to pursue it because of fees which they cannot afford.

“The MoJ now has an opportunity to learn from its mistakes and, as the Committee recommends and as we echo, hold off from its latest plans to restrict access to the Immigration & Asylum Tribunal by increasing fees by 500%.”

On the rise in divorce fees, Nigel Shepherd, chair, Resolution, says: “The committee rightly recognises that this rise effectively amounted to a new tax on divorce; and that by raising it, people were being charged around twice what it actually costs to process a divorce petition.”

Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll