header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fees hike challenged

The Law Society has launched a blistering attack on Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals to hike asylum and immigration tribunal fees by more than 500%.

Law Society president Jonathan Smithers said: “Access to justice for all through the tribunal must trump the “full cost recovery” imperative driving the MoJ’s proposal.

“A significant proportion of appeals that reach the tribunal are upheld. Yet the MoJ itself estimates the 500% fee increase would lead to a 20-40% drop in appeals. Families making joint appeals, where the fee is payable by each family member, will be particularly hard hit, so a family of five would have to pay £4,000 compared to the £800 fee for a single person, though both receive the same ‘service’.”

Smithers said profits from visa applications should be used to fund the tribunal, pointing out that the Home Office charged a fee of £991 for an application for indefinite leave to remain in 2013 compared to an estimated administrative cost of £255. The fees for visas increased in March.

Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll