header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fees hike challenged

The Law Society has launched a blistering attack on Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals to hike asylum and immigration tribunal fees by more than 500%.

Law Society president Jonathan Smithers said: “Access to justice for all through the tribunal must trump the “full cost recovery” imperative driving the MoJ’s proposal.

“A significant proportion of appeals that reach the tribunal are upheld. Yet the MoJ itself estimates the 500% fee increase would lead to a 20-40% drop in appeals. Families making joint appeals, where the fee is payable by each family member, will be particularly hard hit, so a family of five would have to pay £4,000 compared to the £800 fee for a single person, though both receive the same ‘service’.”

Smithers said profits from visa applications should be used to fund the tribunal, pointing out that the Home Office charged a fee of £991 for an application for indefinite leave to remain in 2013 compared to an estimated administrative cost of £255. The fees for visas increased in March.

Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll