header-logo header-logo

06 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fees hike goes ahead

The controversial court fees hike went ahead despite a concerted attempt by the legal profession to stop them.

Court fees rose by as much as 600% from the start of this week. Court users will be charged an extra fee of 5% of the value of all claims worth more than £10,000, up to a maximum of £10,000. The government claims this will bring in an extra £120m, but opponents argue it will price individuals and small businesses out of the courts.

Speaking against the proposals, Lord Pannick warned they would do “inevitable and substantial damage to access to justice” and that was “simply perverse for the government to dispute that many small businesses and many personal injury claimants are going to be unable to pay an upfront £10,000 fee as the price of access to the courts”.

He added: “For many people—those suing for debts or to recover compensation for personal injury—litigation is often a necessity to keep your business alive or to maintain any quality of life. The Minister is absolutely right that there are already many impediments to access to justice. That is surely no justification—no excuse—for the state to erect further high barriers.”

The Law Society has launched a judicial review against the fees increase, and the fee rise is unpopular across the legal profession.

Commercial lawyers have warned it could make the English legal system less competitive than international rivals such as Singapore and Dubai.

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll