header-logo header-logo

Ferry sackings cause shockwave

23 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
P&O Ferries will face expensive legal action for firing 800 crew members with immediate effect via video call, lawyers have predicted

The Dubai-headquartered ferry operator, which sacked the workers last week without consultation, is hiring agency workers to replace the staff on lower wages. It said the action was necessary because it made losses of £100m last year. 

The RMT and Nautilus unions are considering what legal action to take. Trade union law firm Thompsons described the sackings as ‘a shocking disregard of the most basic employment law.

‘The law states that if you’re dismissing more than 20 employees, you must consult with them. The larger the number of employees being dismissed, the longer the consultation should be―up to 45 days.’

Alex Mellis, of No5 Barristers’ Chambers, said: ‘In the short term, we may well see the trade unions seek an injunction in the High Court, although we would expect to see it imminently if it were to happen at all and it is likely to enter a relatively untested area of law.

‘This would essentially force P&O to carry out the consultation with workers that should have happened.’

He said the unions could also bring a complaint to the employment tribunal for failure to provide consultation, and the tribunal could order a protective award ‘in the form of a week’s pay for a period of 90 days, dependent on the severity and egregiousness of the breach by the employer, so we could see P&O needing to pay out up to 90 days’ additional pay for all 800 employees.’

Mellis said: ‘There are also grounds for these workers to individually claim for unfair dismissal...the pay-out will be capped at a year’s salary for every employee who takes this step, which may well be a similar amount to the recently announced “enhanced” redundancy packages that have been discussed.’

Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll