header-logo header-logo

Ferry sackings cause shockwave

23 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
P&O Ferries will face expensive legal action for firing 800 crew members with immediate effect via video call, lawyers have predicted

The Dubai-headquartered ferry operator, which sacked the workers last week without consultation, is hiring agency workers to replace the staff on lower wages. It said the action was necessary because it made losses of £100m last year. 

The RMT and Nautilus unions are considering what legal action to take. Trade union law firm Thompsons described the sackings as ‘a shocking disregard of the most basic employment law.

‘The law states that if you’re dismissing more than 20 employees, you must consult with them. The larger the number of employees being dismissed, the longer the consultation should be―up to 45 days.’

Alex Mellis, of No5 Barristers’ Chambers, said: ‘In the short term, we may well see the trade unions seek an injunction in the High Court, although we would expect to see it imminently if it were to happen at all and it is likely to enter a relatively untested area of law.

‘This would essentially force P&O to carry out the consultation with workers that should have happened.’

He said the unions could also bring a complaint to the employment tribunal for failure to provide consultation, and the tribunal could order a protective award ‘in the form of a week’s pay for a period of 90 days, dependent on the severity and egregiousness of the breach by the employer, so we could see P&O needing to pay out up to 90 days’ additional pay for all 800 employees.’

Mellis said: ‘There are also grounds for these workers to individually claim for unfair dismissal...the pay-out will be capped at a year’s salary for every employee who takes this step, which may well be a similar amount to the recently announced “enhanced” redundancy packages that have been discussed.’

Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll