header-logo header-logo

Fewer divorces but longer delays

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Couples are postponing their divorce due to uncertainties caused by Brexit, family lawyers say.

According to the Family Court Quarterly Statistics for April to June 2019, published last week, 28,144 divorce petitions were made, a fall of 13%, while financial remedy cases fell 5%. Divorces take longer on average, up five weeks to 33 weeks for decree nisi and up three weeks to 58 weeks for Decree Absolute. Only 41% of care proceedings meet the 26-week target―the average time is 33 weeks.

Desmond O’Donnell, partner at Thomson Snell & Passmore, attributed the decrease in couples divorcing to ‘the uncertainty over Brexit, based on their perception that their (or their spouse’s) employment position is less secure now’.

Other reasons included ‘difficulty in selling the matrimonial home, which is often the most valuable asset’ and the fact many couples are choosing to cohabit rather than marry.

Lawyers also lamented increased delays in the family courts.

O’Donnell said cases are taking longer due to ‘various factors, including more individuals acting in person who often file incorrect paperwork, which adds to the court’s workload and delays the progress of the case; a decrease in the number of full time judges and/or an increase in the judge’s workload, all of which means it takes the court longer to process divorces or fix financial hearings’.

Deborah Jeff, partner at Seddons, said: ‘The figures reflect why frustration is being felt by court users―the court process is slowing down considerably.’

Laura Burrows, family associate at Collyer Bristow, said ‘Although the Family Court continues to move towards online divorce, it is under immense pressure. The regional divorce centres set up in 2015 are experiencing high volumes of work and staff shortages, and delays have reached unprecedented levels, impacting on divorcing couples who are unable to move on with their lives and facing increasing legal fees.’

Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll