header-logo header-logo

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Fewer divorces but longer delays

Couples are postponing their divorce due to uncertainties caused by Brexit, family lawyers say.

According to the Family Court Quarterly Statistics for April to June 2019, published last week, 28,144 divorce petitions were made, a fall of 13%, while financial remedy cases fell 5%. Divorces take longer on average, up five weeks to 33 weeks for decree nisi and up three weeks to 58 weeks for Decree Absolute. Only 41% of care proceedings meet the 26-week target―the average time is 33 weeks.

Desmond O’Donnell, partner at Thomson Snell & Passmore, attributed the decrease in couples divorcing to ‘the uncertainty over Brexit, based on their perception that their (or their spouse’s) employment position is less secure now’.

Other reasons included ‘difficulty in selling the matrimonial home, which is often the most valuable asset’ and the fact many couples are choosing to cohabit rather than marry.

Lawyers also lamented increased delays in the family courts.

O’Donnell said cases are taking longer due to ‘various factors, including more individuals acting in person who often file incorrect paperwork, which adds to the court’s workload and delays the progress of the case; a decrease in the number of full time judges and/or an increase in the judge’s workload, all of which means it takes the court longer to process divorces or fix financial hearings’.

Deborah Jeff, partner at Seddons, said: ‘The figures reflect why frustration is being felt by court users―the court process is slowing down considerably.’

Laura Burrows, family associate at Collyer Bristow, said ‘Although the Family Court continues to move towards online divorce, it is under immense pressure. The regional divorce centres set up in 2015 are experiencing high volumes of work and staff shortages, and delays have reached unprecedented levels, impacting on divorcing couples who are unable to move on with their lives and facing increasing legal fees.’

Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll