header-logo header-logo

22 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Figures suggest regulator tougher on black and Asian solicitors

Black and Asian solicitors are disproportionately likely to be investigated for regulatory breaches, official figures have revealed

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) published its annual report on its enforcement activities, ‘Upholding professional standards 2018/19’, this month, showing how it handled more than 9,500 reports and 3,600 investigations during 2018/19.

In total, about 18% of the solicitor population is black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME). Of concerns raised with the SRA, however, 26% related to BAME solicitors. 32% of the cases the SRA decided to investigate involved BAME solicitors. A higher proportion then proceeded to a full disciplinary hearing―35% of these involved BAME solicitors.

BAME solicitors were also more likely to go through a full hearing than have their cases resolved through an agreed outcome. 

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘It is a picture seen across many regulators; some of the potential factors may be wider societal issues and others may be particular to the legal sector.’ The SRA intends to commission independent research into why so many BAME solicitors are being reported.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is extremely concerning that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors continue to feature disproportionately in the numbers of complaints received about solicitors, investigations taken up by the SRA and sanctions issued by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

‘Our recent “Race For Inclusion” report found that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors face barriers to progression at every stage of their career―including microaggressions, the ethnicity pay gap, and pressure to fit into a certain culture.’

Greene highlighted that the legal sector ‘stands for access to justice, equality for all and the rule of law.

‘We must ensure that within our profession, there is equality at all stages and solicitors’ chances of being complained about or investigated are not influenced by race or ethnicity’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll