header-logo header-logo

22 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Figures suggest regulator tougher on black and Asian solicitors

Black and Asian solicitors are disproportionately likely to be investigated for regulatory breaches, official figures have revealed

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) published its annual report on its enforcement activities, ‘Upholding professional standards 2018/19’, this month, showing how it handled more than 9,500 reports and 3,600 investigations during 2018/19.

In total, about 18% of the solicitor population is black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME). Of concerns raised with the SRA, however, 26% related to BAME solicitors. 32% of the cases the SRA decided to investigate involved BAME solicitors. A higher proportion then proceeded to a full disciplinary hearing―35% of these involved BAME solicitors.

BAME solicitors were also more likely to go through a full hearing than have their cases resolved through an agreed outcome. 

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘It is a picture seen across many regulators; some of the potential factors may be wider societal issues and others may be particular to the legal sector.’ The SRA intends to commission independent research into why so many BAME solicitors are being reported.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is extremely concerning that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors continue to feature disproportionately in the numbers of complaints received about solicitors, investigations taken up by the SRA and sanctions issued by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

‘Our recent “Race For Inclusion” report found that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors face barriers to progression at every stage of their career―including microaggressions, the ethnicity pay gap, and pressure to fit into a certain culture.’

Greene highlighted that the legal sector ‘stands for access to justice, equality for all and the rule of law.

‘We must ensure that within our profession, there is equality at all stages and solicitors’ chances of being complained about or investigated are not influenced by race or ethnicity’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll