header-logo header-logo

11 November 2016 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

The file? What’s that?

nlj_7722_harrison

Richard Harrison looks at modern ways of storing and accessing client information

It used to be so simple. You had a client. Who had a “matter”. For each particular matter, there was a cardboard “file”, labelled with the name of the client and the description of the matter.

There were various methods of organisation but generally you had a clip for “correspondence”: (letters in letters out, attendance notes, instructions to counsel), which would generally be in ascending chronological order. Then there was a flap for loose drafts and documents and possibly a separate folder for important documents such as contracts or pleadings.

Original court documents could be identified as such because they were sewn up with green tape. This practice gradually declined among progressive practitioners, to be superseded by the branded folded corner.

If the matter was complex or long-running, you would have several such folders or would transfer everything into nicely labelled lever-arch files.

To understand what had happened in the case previously, and its current status and future intentions, you looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll