header-logo header-logo

The file? What’s that?

11 November 2016 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_harrison

Richard Harrison looks at modern ways of storing and accessing client information

It used to be so simple. You had a client. Who had a “matter”. For each particular matter, there was a cardboard “file”, labelled with the name of the client and the description of the matter.

There were various methods of organisation but generally you had a clip for “correspondence”: (letters in letters out, attendance notes, instructions to counsel), which would generally be in ascending chronological order. Then there was a flap for loose drafts and documents and possibly a separate folder for important documents such as contracts or pleadings.

Original court documents could be identified as such because they were sewn up with green tape. This practice gradually declined among progressive practitioners, to be superseded by the branded folded corner.

If the matter was complex or long-running, you would have several such folders or would transfer everything into nicely labelled lever-arch files.

To understand what had happened in the case previously, and its current status and future intentions, you looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll