header-logo header-logo

The file? What’s that?

11 November 2016 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_harrison

Richard Harrison looks at modern ways of storing and accessing client information

It used to be so simple. You had a client. Who had a “matter”. For each particular matter, there was a cardboard “file”, labelled with the name of the client and the description of the matter.

There were various methods of organisation but generally you had a clip for “correspondence”: (letters in letters out, attendance notes, instructions to counsel), which would generally be in ascending chronological order. Then there was a flap for loose drafts and documents and possibly a separate folder for important documents such as contracts or pleadings.

Original court documents could be identified as such because they were sewn up with green tape. This practice gradually declined among progressive practitioners, to be superseded by the branded folded corner.

If the matter was complex or long-running, you would have several such folders or would transfer everything into nicely labelled lever-arch files.

To understand what had happened in the case previously, and its current status and future intentions, you looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll