header-logo header-logo

30 September 2022 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Features , Media , Libel , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Filming fact & fiction

96063
‘All characters & events depicted in this film are entirely fictitious… even when they’re not’: Athelstane Aamodt examines some perilous portrayals on the big & small screen

If you watch film credits all the way to the end, you might notice a piece of wording that features near their conclusion. It usually says the following: ‘All characters and events depicted in this film are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental’. Most films involve entirely and obviously fictional events and people, which does rather beg the question: why is it there?

Troublesome title cards

Anyone who has studied law in England will be at least vaguely aware of a case called Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Ltd (1934) 78 Sol Jo 617. In that case, the plaintiff was a Russian princess, Irinia Youssoupoff. She had been portrayed (under a different name) in a film called Rasputin and the Empress (also called Rasputin and the Mad Monk) which had been made and distributed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll