header-logo header-logo

28 March 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The final fight

web_mason

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate round-up

In the case of Marley v Rawlings and Anor [2014] UKSC 2, [2014] 1 All ER 807, Alfred Rawlings and his wife Maureen Rawlings executed wills drafted by their solicitor on 17 May 1999. The wills were identical; each spouse left his or her estate to the other, and then to Terry Marley, who they treated as their son.

By an oversight, the solicitor gave each spouse the other’s draft will, which were then signed in error.

Mrs Rawlings died in 2003. Her estate passed to Mr Rawlings without anyone noticing the error, which only came to light when Mr Rawlings died in August 2006. Mr and Mrs Rawlings’ two sons challenged the validity of the will that Mr Rawlings had signed. If it was invalid, Mr Rawlings would have died intestate and the sons would inherit the estate.

Mr Marley sought rectification of the will signed by Mr Rawlings under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll