header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 March 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The final fight

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_mason

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate round-up
In the case of Marley v Rawlings and Anor [2014] UKSC 2, [2014] 1 All ER 807, Alfred Rawlings and his wife Maureen Rawlings executed wills drafted by their solicitor on 17 May 1999. The wills were identical; each spouse left his or her estate to the other, and then to Terry Marley, who they treated as their son.

By an oversight, the solicitor gave each spouse the other’s draft will, which were then signed in error.

Mrs Rawlings died in 2003. Her estate passed to Mr Rawlings without anyone noticing the error, which only came to light when Mr Rawlings died in August 2006. Mr and Mrs Rawlings’ two sons challenged the validity of the will that Mr Rawlings had signed. If it was invalid, Mr Rawlings would have died intestate and the sons would inherit the estate.

Mr Marley sought rectification of the will signed by Mr Rawlings under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll