header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

The final straw?

Malcolm Dowden on planning enforcement & immunity

In swift succession the Court of Appeal and the High Court have ruled on immunity from enforcement where four years have passed since a breach of planning control. In Welwyn Hatfield v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWCA Civ 26, the Court of Appeal reluctantly concluded that a house “disguised” as a barn was immune, and that the owner was entitled to a certificate of lawful use or development. In Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 143 (Admin) an enforcement notice was upheld where a new house had, for four years, been concealed behind straw bales and tarpaulin.

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s 171B provides immunity from enforcement action after the end of the period of four years following substantial completion of operations “consisting in the carrying out without planning permission of building, engineering, mining or other operations in, on, over or under land”. Once a breach of planning control has become immune from enforcement,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll