header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

The final straw?

Malcolm Dowden on planning enforcement & immunity

In swift succession the Court of Appeal and the High Court have ruled on immunity from enforcement where four years have passed since a breach of planning control. In Welwyn Hatfield v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWCA Civ 26, the Court of Appeal reluctantly concluded that a house “disguised” as a barn was immune, and that the owner was entitled to a certificate of lawful use or development. In Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 143 (Admin) an enforcement notice was upheld where a new house had, for four years, been concealed behind straw bales and tarpaulin.

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s 171B provides immunity from enforcement action after the end of the period of four years following substantial completion of operations “consisting in the carrying out without planning permission of building, engineering, mining or other operations in, on, over or under land”. Once a breach of planning control has become immune from enforcement,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll