header-logo header-logo

Finance Act 2010, Schedule 6, Part 2 (Commencement) Order 2012 (SI 2012/736)

13 March 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Applies the new definitions of ‘charity’, ‘charitable company’ and ‘charitable trust’ set out in Part 1 of Schedule 6 to the Finance Act 2010 for the purposes of certain tax enactments.

Commencement date

As specified


Enabling Power

Finance Act 2010 Sch 6, para 34(1)(b), (2), (3)

Summary

It does this by bringing into force amendments in Part 2 of Schedule 6 which remove existing definitions applying for the purposes of those enactments. On the coming into force of these amendments, the effect of paragraph 33(2) of Schedule 6 is that the new definitions will apply.

The new definition of charity has already been applied for the purposes of Chapter 2 of Part 8 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (gift aid) . See also the Finance Act 2010, Schedule 6, Part 1 (Further Consequential and Incidental Provision etc) Order 2012/735 which applies the new definition of ‘charity’ for the purposes of enactments relating to value

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll