header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A financial performance

Theatrics used to unveil the budget do not hide the impact of taxation and timing, says Peter Vaines

Gordon Brown started his Budget speech in cracking form with some payback comments directed at former colleagues who had been sniping at him earlier in the week. And he ended it with a moment of pure theatre. He got to that part of the Budget where he commends it to the House but just before those words were uttered he said something like “oh sorry I forgot to mention, I’m reducing income tax by 2p to 20%”, and sat down.

Poor Mr Cameron. He had already written his reply, assuming he could amend it slightly as the Chancellor ploughed through the boring bits, but this last line gave him only 15 seconds to take it in. These theatricals may have been appropriate for Budget Day, but did not distract the analysts who gave the Budget a serious thumbs down.

It is an extraordinary feature that most changes do not relate to the forthcoming year.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll