header-logo header-logo

A financial performance

30 March 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Theatrics used to unveil the budget do not hide the impact of taxation and timing, says Peter Vaines

Gordon Brown started his Budget speech in cracking form with some payback comments directed at former colleagues who had been sniping at him earlier in the week. And he ended it with a moment of pure theatre. He got to that part of the Budget where he commends it to the House but just before those words were uttered he said something like “oh sorry I forgot to mention, I’m reducing income tax by 2p to 20%”, and sat down.

Poor Mr Cameron. He had already written his reply, assuming he could amend it slightly as the Chancellor ploughed through the boring bits, but this last line gave him only 15 seconds to take it in. These theatricals may have been appropriate for Budget Day, but did not distract the analysts who gave the Budget a serious thumbs down.

It is an extraordinary feature that most changes do not relate to the forthcoming year.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll