header-logo header-logo

A fine distinction

23 April 2009 / David Burrows
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Ratcliffe should be compulsory reading for all family practitioners. David Burrows explains why

For the family lawyer Ratcliffe v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWCA Civ 39, [2009] All ER (D) 25 (Feb) performs three separate functions.
      
      ●     First, it shows the Court of Appeal looking at dependant's pensions for a relatively narrow class of unmarried claimant. To that extent it is of limited value, perhaps.
      
      ●     Second, it shows the Court of Appeal carefully analysing a Human Rights Act 1998 issue, in this case in the field of discrimination.
      
      ●     And finally it provides an example of a meticulous approach—by Lord Justuce Hooper, who gave the lead judgment—to the exercise of a judicial discretion; and in that wider context, the judgment is of value, to judge and practising family lawyer alike.

Barbara Ratcliff e had lived with Lt Cdr K since 1976, but they had not married nor had they had any children. They lived as a married couple and were so regarded by most people. Lt Cdr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll