header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

When you “notify” do you also “inform”? asks Nicholas Dobson

Why would people spend good money in getting lawyers to argue for them over the meaning of words? Are they all practising pedants?

Not at all. For if “equity does nothing in vain” neither will most litigants. There will usually be some fundamental and serious issue riding on disputed interpretations of words. And so there was in the Court of Appeal last October where the legal meaning of the words “inform” and “notify” came up for scrutiny in the context of homelessness law (see Ali v. Birmingham City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 1279).

This is in the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), pt 7. In particular, s 193 imposes a duty on local housing authorities to secure that accommodation is available for a homeless applicant where the authority is satisfied that the applicant is homeless, eligible for assistance, has a priority need and is not satisfied that the applicant became homeless intentionally. However, under s 193(5) an authority ceases to be subject to this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll