header-logo header-logo

Fines hike proposed in misconduct crackdown

09 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Legal professionals could face tougher financial penalties and heightened scrutiny, under plans put forward by super-regulator the Legal Services Board (LSB)

The LSB, which oversees all ten legal services regulators, announced last week that it will review the tools available to regulators with a view to raising the financial penalties at their disposal and enabling them to proactively gather information and share intelligence about wrongdoing.

Alan Kershaw, LSB Chair, said: ‘For some time, we have been concerned that a lack of effective fining powers among some regulators, particularly the SRA, may hamper their ability to tackle wilful and serious misconduct.’

Anna Bradley, chair, SRA Board, said: ‘We have, for some years now advocated that the SRA be given unlimited fining powers to create that deterrent more quickly.

‘While individual solicitors should face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) for serious wrongdoing (and in appropriate cases forfeit their right to practise), that does not preclude the SRA from also fining them and their firm.’

However, the Law Society strongly opposes further hikes in penalties.

Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘There is no evidence that the SRA’s current fining powers are insufficient.

‘The SRA does not exist on its own in the regulatory process. It sits alongside the SDT, which already has draconian powers to sanction any wrongdoing in the solicitors’ profession. These include not only fining powers but also the ability to remove a solicitor from the profession altogether.

‘The SDT remains the appropriate forum for serious cases of alleged misconduct. Further extending the SRA’s powers risks undermining the SDT’s role and authority and potentially reducing the sanctions imposed on bad conduct.’

The maximum penalty the SRA can impose was raised from £2,000 to £25,000 in July, 2022.

The SRA receives more than 10,000 complaints about firms and individual lawyers each year. In 2021/22, it referred 1,741 matters for investigation, resulting in 301 sanctions of which 49 were fines. It referred 76 cases of serious misconduct to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). 

The government is currently considering increasing the maximum SRA penalty for misconduct that falls into the category of economic crime.

Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll