header-logo header-logo

04 February 2020
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fire at Chancery Lane

Just three days after the fire, all teams are back in 113!

Twenty-five fire engines and about 150 firefighters attended a significant fire at the historic Law Society headquarters on Chancery Lane at the weekend.

London Fire Brigade said ‘the roof of the six-storey building and a staircase from the third to the fifth floor were destroyed by the fire. Half of the third and fourth floor were also damaged’.

Firefighters were called at 10.40 pm on Saturday and the fire was under control by 9.48am the next day.

Guests and staff attending a Junior Lawyers Division dinner in the building, and 11 people from nearby flats, were evacuated.

Assistant Commissioner Dom Ellis, who was at the scene, said: ‘This was a very complex fire due to the age and layout of the building.

‘Firefighters worked throughout the night in very challenging and arduous conditions to prevent the fire from spreading to key areas of the historic building, while also trying to prevent water damage. Crews remained on scene throughout Sunday damping down and cutting away. They also carried out salvage work to minimise damage to the building.’

Paul Tennant, chief executive of the Law Society of England and Wales, hailed the efforts of fire fighters who helped preserve the organisation’s Grade 2 listed building at 113 and 114 Chancery Lane in the capital when fire broke out.

‘Our first concern was for our guests and staff and once we established there were no injuries our thoughts turned to our landmark building,’ Tenant said. While the fire caused extensive damage to the roof and upper floors of 114 we are delighted that 113 -  housing the library, Reading Room and other key areas most familiar to our members and visitors - was preserved. We are indebted to the remarkable work of the fire service.  

 ‘Just three days after the fire, our teams are back in 113, our doors are open and planned events and meetings are going ahead which is a testament to our staff and everyone who works with the Society. 

 ‘I would like to thank the many people who sent good wishes and messages of support and offers of help – all of these were greatly appreciated at this challenging time. We have begun the process of assessing the damage and managing the next stage of our recovery.’

 

Issue: 7873 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll