header-logo header-logo

22 March 2024 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fire & rehire: lessons from P&O

164876
Final fire & rehire code treads carefully through a legal & policy minefield, says Charles Pigott
  • The final draft of the statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement was published in February 2024 and is due to take effect in the summer.
  • The government believes the new code will help ‘tackle fire and rehire practices by balancing protections for workers with business flexibility’.

A final draft of the new statutory code on dismissal and re-engagement (fire and rehire) has now been laid before Parliament. Subject to its approval by a resolution of both Houses of Parliament, the government plans to bring it into effect over the summer.

The publication of the final version of the code follows last year’s consultation over an earlier draft. That in turn was prompted by the P&O scandal in 2022, when nearly 800 seafarers were dismissed without any consultation, though they were not offered re-engagement on new terms in that case.

Purpose & scope of code

When an employer is proposing adverse

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll