header-logo header-logo

Firms facing data management crisis

05 June 2008
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Legal news

Poor data management means more than a quarter of UK law firms would be unable to work and could permanently lose their data if a disaster struck, a new survey shows.

The study by communications technology provider Kingston Communications reveals that 28% of law firms rely on on-site automated or manual back-up.

This means that if the lawyers were unable to get onto their premises, eg as a result of fire or flood, then access to systems and documents would, at best, be limited, and at worst, work would have to cease altogether.

Many legal firms depend on staff to manage data, with half of the firms questioned requiring employees to perform data storage tasks as par t of the back-up routine. This, says the report, is a high risk strategy, as recent research by ITPolicy- Compliance.com shows that human error—such as employees deleting or saving over information— accounts for 50% of cases of data loss.

Around 20% of law yers revealed that their firm had lost files after an IT system failure, and nearly one-third said they had lost information to a virus attack. These issues, say the report, are simple to prevent, provided storage, back-up and security solutions are adequately considered and acted upon.

The worst culprits are firms based in the north—where 40% are still backing up data on-site— and smaller firms with fewer than 10 partners, where 60% have no off-site back-up arrangements in place. Most (68%) of firms in the Midlands—16% higher than the national average—require individual employees to perform data back-up tasks. And again it is smaller firms that are more likely to risk their data assets by relying too heavily on human intervention.

Kevin Walsh, executive director at Kingston Communications says: “This research clearly shows that many law firms can’t guarantee the protection and accessibility of critical business information. In the event of a disaster, one in four would not be able to continue working and would likely lose all of their data permanently. This is despite the fact that data back-up does not have to be complicated or expensive.” The study also highlights that the legal industry is embracing technology as a way of improving its efficiency—more than 80% of firms are using electronic communications more than they used to, and two-thirds of lawyers now use a personal digital assistant (PDA) device, such as a BlackBerry, at work. Walsh says: “Employing technology to improve communications can give a competitive edge, however, any implementation has to be seen in a wider context as without the correct back-up and business continuity planning, these advances may be counterproductive as they open up law firms to unnecessary risks.”

Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll