header-logo header-logo

Firms fined

22 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued its first fixed penalties

Three law firms received £750 fines last week for failing to comply with the SRA’s transparency rules. Breaches included failure to publish information explaining key stages and likely timescales for services, failure to publish details on experience and qualifications of those working on areas covered by the rules, and failure to include information on disbursement costs and VAT in published prices.

The SRA, which introduced its fixed penalty regime in May, said it has other live cases which could result in fixed penalties for not complying with the transparency rules. Non-compliance could lead to a second fine of £1,500.

Paul Philip, Chief Executive of the SRA, said: ‘We brought in fixed penalties so we could deal with non-complex breaches of our rules more swiftly.’

Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll