header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms pay price for data breaches

Monetary penalties for “serious” data protection breaches

Two organisations, one a county council, have been served the first monetary penalties for serious breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998.
Organisations can be fined up to £500,000 for serious breaches of the 1998 Act. Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham used these powers last week for the first time, fining Hertfordshire County council £100,000 and employment services company, A4e £60,000.

Graham said: “These first monetary penalties send a strong message to all organisations handling personal information. Get it wrong and you do substantial harm to individuals and the reputation of your business.”

Hertfordshire’s data breach concerned two separate instances of faxes sent to the wrong person by members of the childcare litigation unit.
The first fax involved highly sensitive details of a child sexual abuse case then before the courts. The second fax contained details of child care proceedings and domestic violence records.

Ruling the council failed to take sufficient steps to prevent the second mistake occurring, Graham said it “was difficult to imagine information more sensitive”.

A4e’s breach happened when an employee had their laptop stolen—it contained unencrypted personal information of more than 24,000 people who had used community legal advice centres in Hull and Leicester. Graham ruled A4e had breached the Act by failing to encrypt the laptop.
Both organisations reported the breach to the ICO.

Tom Morrison, partner, Rollits, says: “Both of these cases show how everyday activities can have serious and unintended consequences for an organisation, its staff and the individuals whose personal information may be compromised. Every IT team across the country should be making sure that mobile devices are properly encrypted, and their management teams should be supporting those efforts not least because the senior people within an organisation can in some situations have personal liability for a data protection breach.

“On a practical level, any organisation which provides employees with laptops should identify whether information really needs to be held on that laptop or whether the laptop should be used to connect to a secure service hosted remotely.”
 

Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll