header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Covid-19 , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Firms seek to stay on top with huge increase in online insight

Legal professionals at the top 100 law firms have generated ‘an explosion’ in content marketing such as blogs, articles and thought leadership pieces during lockdown, researchers have found.

Together, they were responsible for an incredible 37,397 pieces of online insight during 2020. By comparison, the top 200 firms produced a cumulative 33,823 insights between them in 2018, according to research by sales and marketing technology platform Passle, ‘2021 Thought Leadership Index’.

Norton Rose Fulbright led the way in terms of sheer volume, producing 1,920 insights over the year, averaging more than three per lawyer (the average across the top 100 was 1.14). CMS (1,124) and Linklaters (1,038) were the next most prolific.

While larger firms produced the most content, the index found a core group of smaller firms has been punching above their weight. Media firm Wiggin LLP created 816 insights, which equates to more than eight posts per lawyer.

Passle ranked the top 100 firms on their combined knowledge pieces, social media activity and followers, with Norton Rose in the top spot followed by Kingsley Napley, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, Taylor Wessing, Burges Salmon, Slaughter and May, Lewis Silkin, Irwin Mitchell and Osborne Clarke.

For social media, LinkedIn was the favoured platform, with firms averaging nearly 27,000 followers. Eight firms have more than 100,000.

On Twitter, the average number of followers was 7,930, with DLA Piper the only firm with more than 40,000 followers, while Allen & Overy, Irwin Mitchell and Hogan Lovells had more than 30,000 each.

Only seven of the top 100 were not using YouTube, but Slater and Gordon can be crowned YouTube king with nearly 11.5m views last year. Irwin Mitchell came second with 940,000.

Adam Elgar, Passle co-founder, said: ‘Particularly in the early days of the pandemic, firms were able to assist their clients and the wider business community hugely by ramping up their insights on the legal implications, with many creating dedicated knowledge hubs.

‘People buy expertise but they also buy people. The savvy use of social media to share insights about both the law and the firm is a great way to sell yourself to potential clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll