header-logo header-logo

Firms seek to stay on top with huge increase in online insight

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Covid-19 , Marketing
printer mail-detail
Legal professionals at the top 100 law firms have generated ‘an explosion’ in content marketing such as blogs, articles and thought leadership pieces during lockdown, researchers have found.

Together, they were responsible for an incredible 37,397 pieces of online insight during 2020. By comparison, the top 200 firms produced a cumulative 33,823 insights between them in 2018, according to research by sales and marketing technology platform Passle, ‘2021 Thought Leadership Index’.

Norton Rose Fulbright led the way in terms of sheer volume, producing 1,920 insights over the year, averaging more than three per lawyer (the average across the top 100 was 1.14). CMS (1,124) and Linklaters (1,038) were the next most prolific.

While larger firms produced the most content, the index found a core group of smaller firms has been punching above their weight. Media firm Wiggin LLP created 816 insights, which equates to more than eight posts per lawyer.

Passle ranked the top 100 firms on their combined knowledge pieces, social media activity and followers, with Norton Rose in the top spot followed by Kingsley Napley, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, Taylor Wessing, Burges Salmon, Slaughter and May, Lewis Silkin, Irwin Mitchell and Osborne Clarke.

For social media, LinkedIn was the favoured platform, with firms averaging nearly 27,000 followers. Eight firms have more than 100,000.

On Twitter, the average number of followers was 7,930, with DLA Piper the only firm with more than 40,000 followers, while Allen & Overy, Irwin Mitchell and Hogan Lovells had more than 30,000 each.

Only seven of the top 100 were not using YouTube, but Slater and Gordon can be crowned YouTube king with nearly 11.5m views last year. Irwin Mitchell came second with 940,000.

Adam Elgar, Passle co-founder, said: ‘Particularly in the early days of the pandemic, firms were able to assist their clients and the wider business community hugely by ramping up their insights on the legal implications, with many creating dedicated knowledge hubs.

‘People buy expertise but they also buy people. The savvy use of social media to share insights about both the law and the firm is a great way to sell yourself to potential clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll