header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Covid-19 , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Firms seek to stay on top with huge increase in online insight

Legal professionals at the top 100 law firms have generated ‘an explosion’ in content marketing such as blogs, articles and thought leadership pieces during lockdown, researchers have found.

Together, they were responsible for an incredible 37,397 pieces of online insight during 2020. By comparison, the top 200 firms produced a cumulative 33,823 insights between them in 2018, according to research by sales and marketing technology platform Passle, ‘2021 Thought Leadership Index’.

Norton Rose Fulbright led the way in terms of sheer volume, producing 1,920 insights over the year, averaging more than three per lawyer (the average across the top 100 was 1.14). CMS (1,124) and Linklaters (1,038) were the next most prolific.

While larger firms produced the most content, the index found a core group of smaller firms has been punching above their weight. Media firm Wiggin LLP created 816 insights, which equates to more than eight posts per lawyer.

Passle ranked the top 100 firms on their combined knowledge pieces, social media activity and followers, with Norton Rose in the top spot followed by Kingsley Napley, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, Taylor Wessing, Burges Salmon, Slaughter and May, Lewis Silkin, Irwin Mitchell and Osborne Clarke.

For social media, LinkedIn was the favoured platform, with firms averaging nearly 27,000 followers. Eight firms have more than 100,000.

On Twitter, the average number of followers was 7,930, with DLA Piper the only firm with more than 40,000 followers, while Allen & Overy, Irwin Mitchell and Hogan Lovells had more than 30,000 each.

Only seven of the top 100 were not using YouTube, but Slater and Gordon can be crowned YouTube king with nearly 11.5m views last year. Irwin Mitchell came second with 940,000.

Adam Elgar, Passle co-founder, said: ‘Particularly in the early days of the pandemic, firms were able to assist their clients and the wider business community hugely by ramping up their insights on the legal implications, with many creating dedicated knowledge hubs.

‘People buy expertise but they also buy people. The savvy use of social media to share insights about both the law and the firm is a great way to sell yourself to potential clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll