header-logo header-logo

Firms seek to stay on top with huge increase in online insight

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Covid-19 , Marketing
printer mail-detail
Legal professionals at the top 100 law firms have generated ‘an explosion’ in content marketing such as blogs, articles and thought leadership pieces during lockdown, researchers have found.

Together, they were responsible for an incredible 37,397 pieces of online insight during 2020. By comparison, the top 200 firms produced a cumulative 33,823 insights between them in 2018, according to research by sales and marketing technology platform Passle, ‘2021 Thought Leadership Index’.

Norton Rose Fulbright led the way in terms of sheer volume, producing 1,920 insights over the year, averaging more than three per lawyer (the average across the top 100 was 1.14). CMS (1,124) and Linklaters (1,038) were the next most prolific.

While larger firms produced the most content, the index found a core group of smaller firms has been punching above their weight. Media firm Wiggin LLP created 816 insights, which equates to more than eight posts per lawyer.

Passle ranked the top 100 firms on their combined knowledge pieces, social media activity and followers, with Norton Rose in the top spot followed by Kingsley Napley, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, Taylor Wessing, Burges Salmon, Slaughter and May, Lewis Silkin, Irwin Mitchell and Osborne Clarke.

For social media, LinkedIn was the favoured platform, with firms averaging nearly 27,000 followers. Eight firms have more than 100,000.

On Twitter, the average number of followers was 7,930, with DLA Piper the only firm with more than 40,000 followers, while Allen & Overy, Irwin Mitchell and Hogan Lovells had more than 30,000 each.

Only seven of the top 100 were not using YouTube, but Slater and Gordon can be crowned YouTube king with nearly 11.5m views last year. Irwin Mitchell came second with 940,000.

Adam Elgar, Passle co-founder, said: ‘Particularly in the early days of the pandemic, firms were able to assist their clients and the wider business community hugely by ramping up their insights on the legal implications, with many creating dedicated knowledge hubs.

‘People buy expertise but they also buy people. The savvy use of social media to share insights about both the law and the firm is a great way to sell yourself to potential clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll