header-logo header-logo

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-detail

Firms warned on sanctions compliance

More than 1,000 law firms have been identified as having no or poor controls when it comes to compliance with financial sanctions

A breach of UK sanctions is a criminal offence, punishable by a fine or imprisonment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced this week it has written to all the firms concerned, offering guidance on compliance, along with a template for firms to use.

Juliet Oliver, SRA deputy chief executive, said: ‘Strengthening the financial sanctions regime is an important part of the government’s response to war in Europe, and law firms have a key role to play.

‘The sanctions regime applies to all firms that provide legal services, not just those that are captured by the anti-money laundering regulations. Firms we have written to responded to our survey last year by saying they did not have or were not aware of a written-down firm-wide risk assessment, or the process for identifying an ultimate beneficial owner.’

Last week, the UK, US and Australia imposed co-ordinated sanctions against key figures involved in financing Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). This is the third round of sanctions by the UK against Hamas and PIJ since the 7 October attacks. Previous rounds sanctioned other top-ranking officials and financiers of Hamas.

The Foreign Office said the asset freezes and travel bans target five individuals, including financier Zuheir Shamlakh, who is believed to have used his money exchange and cryptocurrencies to move large amounts of Iranian funding to Hamas ahead of the 7 October attacks, using legitimate businesses as a front.

According to a report published last week by market intelligence specialists Diligent, ‘Compliance trends 2024’, 21,784 new sanctions were imposed in 2023 (a 50% increase), making third party due diligence a top priority for compliance professionals.

Josh Black, editor-in-chief at Diligent, said: ‘With sanctions changing rapidly, it is increasingly important for companies to have robust and transparent compliance processes in place.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll