header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

FisherBroyles—Anne Davies

Firm appoints new partner
FisherBroyles LLP has announced that Anne Davies has joined the firm in London as a partner.


Anne is a business crime lawyer with 29 years of experience and joins the firm from the challenger law firm gunnercooke where she was a partner for the last four years.

In her practice she focuses on health and safety, handling a broad range of regulatory investigations and prosecutions, assisting both companies and individuals to minimise the risk of criminal liabilities arising from internal or external investigations. She handles domestic and international business crime litigation matters including, health and safety, bribery and corruption, environmental crimes, product safety and white-collar crime.

Prior to gunnercooke, she practiced with Withers and Crowell & Moring, and is a graduate of the University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, and Chester College of Law with Law Society Finals First Class Honours.

Michael Pierson, managing partner of the firm’s global corporate practice, said: ‘We are delighted to welcome Anne to our growing team in London which has gone from strength to strength since our expansion into the UK earlier this year. Anne has a high-profile business crime practice and is a great addition to the “Employment Plus” team that we are building.’

Anne Davies said: ‘For almost four years I’ve had the opportunity to work for a firm that has a similar model to FisherBroyles and as a result I was already a great supporter of the partner led, distributed model which allows for competitive fees for clients and no huge overheads. The attraction of joining FisherBroyles was its US connections and its growing transatlantic team, which I believe will become ever more important in the years to come post-Brexit.

‘FisherBroyles’ ambitious goals for further growth and focus on bringing in partners with stellar backgrounds and ambition was another great draw for me. The fact that lawyers of such a high calibre such as Peter Finding and Rory Graham had already joined the firm only reinforced my assessment.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll