header-logo header-logo

Five shortlisted for LexisNexis Awards Legal Personality of the Year

17 January 2019
Issue: 7824 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The shortlist for the Legal Personality of the Year has been announced by the NLJ editorial team.

All legal professionals are now invited to cast their vote by 5pm on 18 February, by visiting this link. The winner will be revealed at the LexisNexis Legal Awards ceremony in London on 13 March.

First up is Harriet Wistrich, solicitor at Birnberg Peirce and Partners and founder of the Centre for Women’s Justice, which brings cases holding the state to account in relation to violence against women and girls. She launched judicial review proceedings against the Parole Board’s decision to release the notorious ‘Black Cab Rapist’ John Worboys, a decision that horrified his many victims—police believe he may have raped more than 100 women. She succeeded, and went on to successfully represent two of Worboys’ victims in legal action against the police for failing to act earlier.

The next contender is Louise Whitfield, partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn. In June, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of her clients, the heterosexual couple Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, in their challenge against legislation which prevents opposite-sex couples from entering into a civil partnership.

Third, Michael Mylonas QC, head of the Court of Protection team at Serjeants’ Inn, who led the team representing Alder Hey Children's Hospital during the Alfie Evans case, a high-profile and often heated case concerning the decision to withdraw life support from an infant with a severe neurodegenerative disorder. Michael also won a landmark case in the Court of Protection concerning the emergency extraction of sperm for fertility treatment from a man who had suffered a catastrophic brain injury, despite a lack of written consent.

Fourth, Jacqueline McGuigan, of TMP Solicitors, who secured a ground-breaking victory for workers’ rights, in a claim against Pimlico Plumbers. The nub of the case was whether plumber Gary Smith was a ‘worker’ or an ‘independent contractor’. McGuigan’s success means thousands of workers can now benefit from sick pay and holiday pay.

Fifth, finally and by no means least, step forward Cori Crider, a lawyer at Reprieve from 2006 to 2018, defending people from human rights abuses in the post-9/11 era. Last year, Cori secured a major victory in the Supreme Court, in a case regarding the unlawful rendition to Libya of Abdel-Hakim Belhaj and his wife Fatima Boudchar in 2004. Subsequently, prime minister Theresa May took the unprecedented step of apologising to the couple in a letter read out in the House of Commons.

Issue: 7824 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll