header-logo header-logo

27 September 2013 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

In a fix

200544524-001

Escape from fixed costs in the fast track will prove difficult, says Patrick Allen

Fixed costs in the fast track have finally arrived. The rules are found at CPR45.29 A-L. From 1 August personal injury claims worth up to £25,000 must enter the portal. If they then exit the portal eg because liability is not admitted, they become subject to a fixed cost regime where the amount depends on the stage at which settlement is reached, the damages and the case type. This applies to causes of action occurring after 31 July 2013.

Fears realised

Fast track fixed costs have been threatened for the last 15 years and resisted for good reason by claimant lawyers because they feared:

  • Once fixed they would never go up again.
  • They would be fixed too low.
  • Escape would be all but impossible.
  • The amount of work needed would depend largely on complexity and the defendants’ conduct of the case.

All these fears are now realised.

The process of arriving at the level of fixed costs was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll