header-logo header-logo

Fixing courts ‘achievable’ & ‘vital’

25 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Dead seagulls and excrement-soaked floors are just two of the hazards causing delays in court buildings in the past 12 months, a Law Society report has found

The birds were found rotting in the roof insulation at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court in July. Consequently, ‘the court had to close because maggots were literally raining down onto the lobby’, according to an anonymous source quoted in the report. Elsewhere, cases have ground to a halt due to asbestos, mould, inadequate air conditioning and dilapidated toilets.

At Hull Crown Court, lawyers endured several sewage leaks in the robing room, caused by a burst pipe ‘spraying personal items, carpet and desks etc,’ an anonymous source said. ‘This was a significant health risk which led to several counsel and solicitors being very ill.’

The report, ‘State of the courts’, published this week, investigates whether the court infrastructure is fit for purpose. Almost two-thirds (63%) of solicitors surveyed have experienced delays in hearings in the past 12 months due to poor infrastructure.

One in five said the technology in the courts was ‘not at all’ fit for purpose—a 7% increase compared to the 2022 ‘State of the courts’ survey. Tech glitches included poor quality remote hearings, software problems and a lack of working plug sockets in conference rooms and the courts.

Difficulties were heightened for solicitors with a disability, due to a lack of ramps and working lifts or other accessibility limitations. 45% said the physical state of the courts are ‘not at all fit for purpose’, compared to 25% of solicitors with no disability.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson highlighted that the Crown Court backlog is about 77,000 cases, while two-thirds of care cases in family courts take longer than the 26-week time limit.

‘Behind each of these statistics are tens of thousands of adults and children who could be freed from limbo and move forward with their lives if they could have their day in court,’ Atkinson said.

‘This could be an easy win for the government, which has rightly recognised the need for capital and sustained investment in the courts but must go further.’

Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
back-to-top-scroll