header-logo header-logo

Fladgate—Thomas Karalis

05 July 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

New partner for firm’s international arbitration practice

Fladgate has strengthened its international arbitration practice with the appointment of Thomas Karalis as a partner, effective 1 July 2024.

Thomas, who joins from Ashurst, is a dispute resolution lawyer with more than 15 years’ experience conducting arbitrations under leading institutional rules in all major seats, under both civil and common laws. He regularly advises clients on complex and high-value commercial disputes across jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the energy, natural resources and automotive sectors.

He has experience running large, high-value and technically complex disputes, in addition to extensive experience on injunctive relief measures through both the Courts and Emergency Arbitrator proceedings.

Commenting on his appointment, Thomas said: ‘Fladgate is a firm with ambitious plans for its dispute resolution team and I’m excited to be joining at this point in its trajectory. Its client offering is unparalleled and I am looking forward to working with my new colleagues to support our clients’ needs across the international arbitration spectrum.’

Grant Gordon, managing partner at Fladgate, said: ‘Thomas is an invaluable addition to our successful and growing litigation team and will further enhance our international disputes practice.

‘We have a reputation for providing breadth and depth of expertise to our clients to support them through fast moving and complex challenges and welcome Thomas’s skillset to complement our offering. With Thomas’ arrival we continue to build on our reputation as a firm offering a differentiated service and premium approach in the private client space.’

John Evans, head of dispute resolution, added: ‘Thomas brings extensive experience in international arbitration and commercial litigation and with his dual qualification in both England & Wales and in Paris, he will be a great asset in providing high-value advice and support to clients with cross-border issues.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll