header-logo header-logo

Flawed & invalid decision-making by government

04 June 2015
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government was not just flawed in its decision-making but was so wrong that its decisions were invalid and therefore must be set aside, the Upper Tribunal has ruled in twin test cases against the secretary of state for work and pensions ( Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Dukes and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Wheatland (CE/366/2013 and CE/705/2013)).

Mr Dukes challenged the government’s decision to shift him from incapacity benefit to employment and support allowance (ESA) without him having a face-to-face assessment. Mr Wheatland was in receipt of ESA but a decision was made on his capability for work status without the assessment.

The tribunal held that the decision makers were unable to explain their scoring in either case, and that this rendered their decisions invalid.

Morayo Fagborun Bennett,of Hardwicke chambers, junior counsel for Dukes, says: “It is rare for the courts and tribunals to hold that the decision made by the government is invalid or unlawful, as opposed to valid but wrong.”

Issue: 7655 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll