header-logo header-logo

A fleeting fad?

11 July 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
155160048

Is Collaborative Family Law a real option or just a passing craze, asks Edward Heaton

With the government actively encouraging individuals to resolve family disputes through mediation rather than relying on the increasingly over-burdened court system, it would seem that Collaborative Family Law (CFL), a further alternative to litigation, has arrived on the scene at exactly the right time.

What is it?

CFL remains a relatively new concept to England and Wales and could be mistaken for being just one more form of alternative dispute resolution (or just “dispute resolution”, as we are now being encouraged to call it) to add to the many others that already exist. There is, however, perhaps more to CFL than to other methods of dispute resolution, which makes it stand out from the crowd and goes some way to explaining why family lawyers across the country have been undertaking the training required to enable them to practise Collaboratively. But, what exactly is CFL, how does it work and what are its potential benefits?

CFL is a process

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll