header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A fleeting fad?

155160048

Is Collaborative Family Law a real option or just a passing craze, asks Edward Heaton

With the government actively encouraging individuals to resolve family disputes through mediation rather than relying on the increasingly over-burdened court system, it would seem that Collaborative Family Law (CFL), a further alternative to litigation, has arrived on the scene at exactly the right time.

What is it?

CFL remains a relatively new concept to England and Wales and could be mistaken for being just one more form of alternative dispute resolution (or just “dispute resolution”, as we are now being encouraged to call it) to add to the many others that already exist. There is, however, perhaps more to CFL than to other methods of dispute resolution, which makes it stand out from the crowd and goes some way to explaining why family lawyers across the country have been undertaking the training required to enable them to practise Collaboratively. But, what exactly is CFL, how does it work and what are its potential benefits?

CFL is a process

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll