header-logo header-logo

18 March 2011 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Flexi time?

How flexible are you, asks Sarah Johnson

Although fathers have the right to request flexible working, many feel reluctant to do so because of the stigma attached, according to the deputy prime minister recently. He added that current rules are based on a view of life in which mothers stay at home and fathers are the only breadwinners. Planned consultation will consider both a truly flexible system of shared parental leave the government aims to introduce in 2015 and extending the right to request flexible working to all employees.

More immediate changes are also due. Certain carers of adults and of children under 17 currently have rights to request flexible working. These rights will be extended to carers of children under 18 from April 2011.

In addition, paternity rights are being enhanced. Currently, statutory paternity leave is limited to at most two weeks’ paid leave within 56 days of a child’s birth or placement for adoption. Parents of children whose expected week of birth begins, or who are matched for adoption, on or after 3rd

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll