header-logo header-logo

Flexible fears

20 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers fear flexible working is "career suicide"

Lawyers at commercial firms are overwhelmingly in favour of more flexible working in the profession, but fear it would jeopardise their career.

Research by law firm Fletcher Day among nearly 100 solicitors at commercial or mixed firms found 88% in favour of more flexible working arrangements, while two-thirds thought their non-lawyer contacts had more flexible arrangements than they did.

More than three-quarters said taking up flexible working arrangements would affect their future career progression.

Jude Fletcher, senior partner of Fletcher Day, says: “Flexible working is a request that, in too many cases, is made with hesitation and agreed to with reluctance. 

“As one lawyer puts it, too often a flexible working request is seen as ‘career suicide’.”

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll