header-logo header-logo

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Flexible” working on the Queen’s Bench

First flexible vacancies are advertised

A vacancy for a High Court judge to work flexibly or part-time has been advertised for the first time.

In all, nine High Court judge positions are available in the Queen’s Bench and Family Division. Flexible working arrangements will be suitable for one of the Queen’s Bench Division posts. Provisions to allow this came into force in April, to encourage more women to apply.

Applicants need not be a QC or deputy High Court judge, but must be a high performing lawyer with significant experience and show leadership potential.

Lady Hale, deputy president of the Supreme Court, says: “We know there are plenty of able women and other diverse lawyers out there who could be great judges. There are fewer barriers now than ever before.”

Earlier this month, Lady Hale said she hoped to see another female justice in the Supreme Court before she retires.

There are now 19 women in the High Court, a record number, and seven in the Court of Appeal. Women made up a third of the last recommendations to the High Court.

Applications must be made by noon on 4 November.

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll