header-logo header-logo

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Flexible” working on the Queen’s Bench

First flexible vacancies are advertised

A vacancy for a High Court judge to work flexibly or part-time has been advertised for the first time.

In all, nine High Court judge positions are available in the Queen’s Bench and Family Division. Flexible working arrangements will be suitable for one of the Queen’s Bench Division posts. Provisions to allow this came into force in April, to encourage more women to apply.

Applicants need not be a QC or deputy High Court judge, but must be a high performing lawyer with significant experience and show leadership potential.

Lady Hale, deputy president of the Supreme Court, says: “We know there are plenty of able women and other diverse lawyers out there who could be great judges. There are fewer barriers now than ever before.”

Earlier this month, Lady Hale said she hoped to see another female justice in the Supreme Court before she retires.

There are now 19 women in the High Court, a record number, and seven in the Court of Appeal. Women made up a third of the last recommendations to the High Court.

Applications must be made by noon on 4 November.

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll